Journal of Banking & Finance twenty two (1998) 371±403
Corporate governance and panel eectiveness
Kose John a, Lemma T. Senbet
Stern Institution of Organization, New York University, New York, NEW YORK 10012, USA Department of Finance, College or university of Organization, University of Maryland, Tydings Hall, University Park, MARYLAND 20742, USA
Abstract This paper surveys the empirical and assumptive literature for the mechanisms of corporate governance. We give attention to the internal systems of corporate governance (e. g., corporate board of directors) and the role in ameliorating several classes of agency challenges arising from con¯icts of passions between managers and equityholders, equityholders and creditors, and capital contributors and other stakeholders to the corporate and business ®rm. We all also examine the replacement eect among internal components of corporate and business governance and external mechanisms, particularly market segments for business control. Directions for foreseeable future research are provided. Ó 98 Elsevier Technology B. Versus. All privileges reserved. JEL classi®cation: G30; G32 Keywords: Corporate governance; Corporate ®nance; Internal and external mechanisms of corporate and business governance
``Eorts to reform company government have targeted on producing managers worried. It is time how to make panels greedy'' [The Economist, August on the lookout for, 1997]
* one particular
Corresponding writer. Tel.: you 301 405 2242; email: [email protected] umd. edu. This paper was an asked paper on the occasion from the JBF 20th anniversary.
0378-4266/98/$19. 00 Ó 1998 Elsevier Science N. V. Almost all rights appropriated. PII S i9000 0 a few 7 almost eight - some 2 6th 6 ( 9 eight ) 0 0 zero 0 a few - three or more
T. John, D. W. Senbet / Log of Banking & Financial 22 (1998) 371±403
1 ) Introduction Corporate and business governance works with mechanisms by which stakeholders of a corporation workout control over corporate insiders and management so that their passions are guarded. The stakeholders of a company include equityholders, creditors and other claimants who have supply capital, as well as other stakeholders such as employees, consumers, suppliers, and the federal government. The professional managers, the entrepreneur, and also other corporate insiders (we is going to refer to these people collectively as ``managers''), control the key decisions of the corporation. Given the separation of ownership and control (or stakeholding and management) that is certainly endemic to a market economic system, how the stakeholders control managing is the subject of corporate and business governance. Therefore, the primary basis for corporate governance is the splitting up of ownership and control, and the company problems that engenders. In Section two, we explain the various types of company problems due to the separating of title and control. Since dierent types of capital contributing factors and other stakeholders have dierent types of pay-o set ups from the ®rm, the con¯icts of interest that develop and the agency challenges they trigger are dierent. In this study, we will depart from convention and not view corporate governance mechanisms as a means to ameliorate bureaucratic agency concerns arising from con¯ict of interest among managers and equityholders. All of us will look at the function of corporate and business governance mechanisms in dealing with different classes of agency concerns. The topic of business governance offers attained tremendous practical importance for at least 3 reasons. Initially, the eciency of the existing governance components in advanced market financial systems has been the subject of controversy. For example , Jensen (1989, 1993) has argued that the internal mechanisms of corporate governance in the US companies have not performed their work. He features advocated a move through the current company form to a much more extremely levered corporation, similar to a leveraged buyout (LBO). On the other hand, legal scholars, which include Easterbrook and Fischel (1991) and Pontificio (1993), view the US components and the legal system within a favorable light. Second, there is certainly an ongoing controversy on the comparable ecacy with the corporate governance systems...
Referrals: Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C., 1996. Organization performance and mechanisms to control agency complications between managers and investors. Working paper, Wharton School. Bange, Meters., Mazzeo, M., 1996. Table composition, table e€ectiveness plus the observed form of takeover offers. Working paper. Michigan Express University, East Lansing, MI. Barnea, A., Haugen, Ur., Senbet, D., 1985. Organization Problems and Financial Contracting, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cli€s, NJ-NEW JERSEY. Baysinger, W., Butler, H., 1985. Company governance and board of directors: performance e€ects of changes in panel composition. Log of Rules, Economics and Organization 1, 101±124. Bebchuk, L., 1988. A new method for corporate reorganization. Harvard Law Review 101, 775± 804. Berglof, E., 1994. The governance composition of the Western ®nancial kieretsu. Journal of Financial Economics thirty eight, 259±284. Bhagat, S., Dark-colored, B., mil novecentos e noventa e seis. Do 3rd party directors matter? Working newspaper. Columbia University, New York. Bhagat, S., Black, B., 97. Board structure and ®rm performance: The uneasy case for majority-independent panels. Working paper. Columbia School, New York. Brander, J., Lewis, T., 1986. Oligopoly and ®nancial framework: The limited liability e€ect. American Economical Review seventy six, 956±970. Brickley, J., Wayne, C., 1987. The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The truth of banking. The Record of Regulation and Economics 161±181. Brickley, J., Coles, J., Terry, R. L., 1994. Exterior directors plus the adoption of poison supplements. Journal of economic Economics thirty five, 371±390. Chang, C., 95. Performance-based settlement and outside interventions as substitute incentive mechanisms and the dedication role with the board. Operating paper. University or college of Mn, Minneapolis, MN. Chidambaran, N. K., Ruben, K., 97. Relationship investing and corporate governance. Working paper. New York School, New York. Demsetz, H., 1983. The composition of control and the theory of the ®rm. Journal of Law and Economics dua puluh enam, 375±390. Demsetz, H., Lehn, K., 85. The structure of corporate ownership: Triggers and implications. Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155±1177. Diamond, M. W., 1991. Monitoring and reputation: The decision between loans from banks and immediately placed financial debt. Journal of Political Economic climate 99, 688±721. Easternbrook, Farreneheit., Fischel, Deb., 1991. The Economic Composition of Company Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Fama, Electronic., Jensen, Meters., 1983. Separation of control and control. Journal of Law and Economics dua puluh enam, 327±349. Franks, J., Mayer, C., 1994. The possession and control of German businesses. Working daily news. Business Institution. Fosberg, 3rd there�s r., 1989. Outside directors and managerial monitoring. Akron Organization and Economic Review twenty, 24±32. Gale, D., Hellwig, M., 85. Incentive appropriate debt agreements: One period problem. The Review of Economic Research 26, 327±349. Gertner, Ur., Scharfstein, M., Stein, T., 1994. Interior versus external capital market segments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 1211±1230. Gilson, H., 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 28, 355±387. Green, R. C., 1984. Purchase incentives, financial debt, and arrest warrants. Journal of economic Economics 13, 115±136.
K. Steve, L. W. Senbet as well as Journal of Banking & Finance twenty-two (1998) 371±403
Grossman, S i9000., Hart, To., 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider difficulty, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Log of Economics 11, 42±64. Harris, Meters., Raviv, A., 1988. Corporate and business governance: Voting rights and majority rules. Journal of Financial Economics twenty, 203±235. Ubertrieben kritisch, O., Moore, J., 1989. Default and renegotiation: A dynamic model of debt. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 78. The insigni®cance of personal bankruptcy costs towards the theory of optimal capital structure. Diary of Financing 33, 383±393. Haugen, Ur., Senbet, M., 1988. Individual bankruptcy and firm costs: Their particular signi®cance to the theory of optimal capital structure. Log of Financial and Quantitative Evaluation 23, 27±38. Hermalin, W., Weisbach, M., 1997. Endogenously chosen planks of administrators and their monitoring of the CEO. American Monetary Review, future. Hermalin, M., Weisbach, Meters., 1988. The determinants of board structure. RAND Journal of Economics 19, 589±606. Hermalin, W., Weisbach, M., 1991. The e€ects of board formula and immediate incentives upon ®rm overall performance. Financial Managing 101±112. Hirshleifer, D., Thakor, A., 1994. Managerial efficiency, boards of directors and takeover bidding. Journal of Corporate Financing 1, 63±90. Holderness, C., Sheehan, G., 1988. The role of majority shareholders in openly held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 317±346. Jensen, M., 1989. Active buyers, LBOs as well as the privatization of bankruptcy. Journal of Utilized Corporate Fund 2, 35±44. Jensen, M., 1993. The present day industrial innovation, exit, as well as the failure of internal control systems. Diary of Financing 48, 831±880. Jensen, Meters., Meckling, Watts., 1976. Theory of the ®rm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and control structure. Journal of Financial Economics 48, 831±880. Jensen, M., Murphy, K., 1990. Efficiency pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economic system 98, 225±264. Jensen, Meters., Warner, M. B., 1988. The distribution of power among company managers, investors, and owners. Journal of economic Economics twenty. John, E., 1993. Controlling ®nancial stress: A study and a research agenda. Economic Management, Fall. John, Capital t. A., Ruben, K., 93. Top-management compensation and capital structure. Diary of Finance 48, 949±974. John, K., Senbet, D., 1996. Limited liability, corporate leverage, and public coverage. Working daily news. New York College or university. John, T., John, Big t., Senbet, M., 1991. Risk-shifting incentives of depository establishments: A new perspective on government deposit insurance reform. Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 895± 915. David, K., Saunders, A., Senbet, L. Watts., 1997. A theory of bank rules and supervision compensation. Operating paper. School of Maryland and New york city University. David, K., Senbet, L. Watts., Sundaram, A. K. (1994). Corporate limited liability as well as the design of corporate taxation. Unpublished paper. School of Baltimore and Ny University. Kaplan, S., year 1994. Top executive rewards and ®rm performance: A comparison of Japan plus the US. Log of Personal Economy 102, 510±546. Kaplan, S., 1997. The evolution of US company governance: We are all Henry Kravis now. Functioning paper. University of Chicago, Chicago, ARIANNE. Kedia, S i9000., 1997a. Product market competition and top management compensation. Working daily news. Harvard College or university, Cambridge, MUM. Kedia, S., 1997b. Item markets plus the strategic function of governance mechanisms. Doing work paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
T. John, L. W. Senbet / Diary of Banking & Financial 22 (1998) 371±403
Klein, A., 1995. A great examination of panel committee buildings. Working newspaper. New York College or university, New York. Klein, A., Rosenfeld, J., 1988. Targeted reveal repurchase and top administration changes. Diary of Financial Economics 20, 493±506. Kini, Um., Kracaw, T., Mian, S i9000., 1995. Company takeovers, ®rm performance, and board structure. Journal of Corporate Financing 1, 383±412. Lipton, Meters., Lorsch, T., 1992. A modest proposal for better corporate governance. Business Attorney 59, 59±77. Mace, Meters., 1986. Administrators, Myth, and Reality. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Maksimovic, Sixth is v., 1986. Optimal capital composition in repeated oligopolies. Rand Journal nineteen, 389±407. Madan, S., Senbet, L., Soubra, B., 95. Capital framework and the type of managerial payment. Working paper. University of Maryland, University Park, MI. Mayers, G., Shivadashani, A., Smith, C., 1997. Plank composition and company control: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Organization 70 (1), forthcoming. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1989. Alternative components for company control. American Economic Review 79, 842±852. Myers, T., 1977. Determinants of corporate and business borrowing. Diary of Financial Economics 11±41. Noe, T., Rebello, M. M., 1996. The appearance of corporate planks: Composition, settlement, factions, and turnover. Operating paper. Atlanta State University, Atlanta, GA. Park, H., Roze€, M., 1996. The role of outside shareholders, exterior boards, and management entrenchment in CEO selection. Functioning paper. SUNY, Bu€alo, BIG APPLE. Rajan, Ur. G., 1992. Insiders and outsiders: The option between informed and adjustable rate mortgage 's-length debt. Journal of Finance XLVII 1367±1400. Latino, R., 1993. The Guru of American Company Law. American Enterprise Start Press, Wa DC. Rosenstein, S., Wyatt, J. G., 1990. Outside the house directors, board independence, and shareholder prosperity. Journal of economic Economics 26, 176±191. Senbet, L., Seward, J., 1995. Financial distress, bankruptcy and reorganization. In: Jarrow, L., Maksimovic, Versus., Ziemba, T. (Eds. ), Finance. North-Holland, Amsterdam. The brand new York Instances, 1997. The Search for the Perfect Corporate Board. Schroder, U., Schrader, A., 1996. The changing function of banking companies and corporate governance in Australia: Evolution toward the market? Doing work paper. Deutsche Bank Research. Shleifer, A., Vishny, L., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Log of Political Economy 94, 461±488. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 97. A survey of corporate governance. Record of Fund 52, 737±775. Shivdasani, A., 1993. Table composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 167±198. Stulz, R., 1988. Managerial power over voting legal rights. Journal of Financial Economics twenty, 25±59. Townsend, R., lates 1970s. Optimal agreements and competitive markets with costly condition veri®cation. Log of Monetary Theory twenty one, 265±293. Warther, V., 1994. Board e€ectiveness and table dissent: An auto dvd unit of the board 's relationship to administration and shareholders. Working daily news. USC. Weisbach, M., 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 431± 460. Wenger, E., Kaserer, C., 1996. The A language like german system of business governance: An auto dvd unit which should certainly not be imitated. Working daily news. University of Wuerzburg. Whisler, T., 1984. Rules with the Game, Dow Jones ± Irwin, Homewood, IL. Williamson, O. E., 1983. Company form, recurring claimants, and company control. Log of Law and Economics 26, 351. Yermack, Deb., 1996. Bigger market valuation of businesses with a little board of directors. Diary of Financial Economics 40, 185±211.