INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS, AND ADMINISTRATION VOLUME LEVEL 15, NUMBER 1, 2011
Motivating by Enriching Jobs to Make Them More Interesting and Difficult Fred C. Lunenburg
Sam Houston State University
ABSTRACT Job enrichment is a job-design strategy for boosting job content by building into it more encouraging potential. Increasing on the operate of Frederick Herzberg, Rich Hackman and Greg Oldham provide an precise framework for enriching jobs. Based on their own work plus the work of others, they created a job features model. Particularly, the version specifies that enriching particular elements of jobs alters someones psychological declares in a manner that improves their operate effectiveness.
Job enrichment is directed at enhancing the essential nature of the operate performed. The theory behind job enrichment is that motivation could be enhanced by looking into making the job and so interesting and the worker therefore responsible that she or he is enthusiastic simply by performing the job. Especially, job enrichment gives personnel tasks requiring higher degrees of skill and responsibility and greater control over how to execute their jobs. Job enrichment has their roots in Frederick Herzberg's (2009) two-factor theory of motivation.
The position Characteristics Unit How can jobs be rampacked? What portions of a job should be enriched for doing it to produce ideal outcomes? L. Richard Hackman and Greg Oldham (1980) developed a job characteristics method to job richness. The model is based on the assumption that jobs may be designed not just in help workers get enjoyment from their careers but likewise to help staff feel that they can be doing significant and useful work. Specifically, the unit identifies five core job characteristics that help create three essential psychological states, leading, in turn, to several personal and job outcomes (see Figure 1).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION, AND ADMINISTRATION 2____________________________________________________________________________________
Main Job Features
Critical Emotional States
Personal and Operate Outcomes
Skill variety Process identity Activity significance Autonomy
Experienced meaningfulness of the job Experienced responsibility for final results of the job Knowledge of using the results in the work actions
High interior work motivation High growth satisfaction Substantial general work satisfaction Substantial work effectiveness
Moderators п‚· Knowledge and skill п‚· Growth-need strength п‚· Circumstance satisfaction
Physique 1 . Work enrichment unit.
Components of the Model The five main job features are skill variety, job identity, task significance, autonomy, and job feedback. Let's examine every one of these more strongly. Skill selection. Skill selection is the level to which a career requires a variety of different actions and involves the use of a number of different skills and talents with the employee. Careers that are loaded with skill selection are seen by employees as: more challenging as a result of range of abilities involved; relieve monotony which will result from repeating activity; and share employees a better sense of competence. For instance , an management assistant with high skill variety may have to perform many different tasks (e. g., routine meetings, produce airline and hotel bookings, do research, make written reviews, and talk with customers). Process identity. Job identity is definitely the degree that a job requires completion of a " wholeвЂќ and well-known piece of workвЂ”that is, performing a job coming from beginning to end with a visible outcome. Once employees focus on a small portion of the whole, they can be unable to
SALLY C. LUNENBURG ____________________________________________________________________________________3
discover any completed product with their efforts. They can not feel any kind of sense of completion or responsibility for the whole product. Yet , when duties are broadened to produce a whole product or an recognizable part...
References: Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and progress. New York, NYC: Free Press. Behson, S. J., Turn, E. R., & Lorenzet, S. L. (2000). The importance of the critical psychological declares in the task characteristics version: A meta-analytic and strength equations building examination. Current Research in Social Mindset, 5(12), 170-189. Dean, L. W., & Snell, S i9000. A. (1991). Integrated developing and task design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Managing Journal, 34(4)776-804. Engstrom, Capital t., & Medbo, L. (1994). Intra-group function patterns in final assemblage of automobiles. International Diary of Procedures and Production Management, 14(3), 101-113. Toast, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics version: A review and meta-analysis. Workers Psychology, forty, 287-322. Fiorelli, J., & Feller, 3rd there’s r. (1994). Re-engineering TQM and work upgrade: An integrative approach to continuous organizational brilliance. Public Government Quarterly, 18(1), 54-63. Richer, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Advertising felt responsibility for beneficial change and proactive behavior: Exploring areas of an elaborated model of operate design. Diary of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1089-1120. Gladwin, L. C. (2001, 04 12). Volvo delves in web-based car design. Computerworld, 8-10. Graen, G. W., Scandura, Big t. A., & Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test from the moderating associated with growth will need strength on productivity. Log of Applied Psychology, 71, 486-491. Give, A. Meters. (2008). The significance of job significance: Work performance effects, relational components, and border conditions. Log of Applied Psychology, 93, 108-124.
INTERCONTINENTAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS, AND ADMINISTRATION 10____________________________________________________________________________________
Greenberg, J. (2011). Behavior in organizations (10th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Griffeth, R. W., Car horn, P. Watts., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of worker turnover: Update, moderator assessments, and analysis implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488. Hackman, T. R. (1976). Work redesign. In J. R. Hackman & M. L. Shuttle service (Eds. ). Improving existence at work (pp. 96-162). Father christmas Monica, LOS ANGELES: Goodyear. Hackman, J. L., & Oldham, G. (1975). Development of the task diagnostic review. Journal of Applied Mindset, 60, 159-170. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation throughout the design of work: Test of the theory. Company Behavior and Human Efficiency, 16, 250-279. Hackman, M. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MOTHER: AddisonWesley. Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, M. W. (2011). Organizational tendencies (13th impotence. ). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Herzberg, N. (2009). One more time: How do you stimulate employees? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business University Press. Humphrey, S. Electronic., Nahrgang, T. D., & Morgeson, N. P. (2007). Integrating mindset, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the operate design books. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332-1356. Johns, G., Xie, T. L., & Fang, Con. (1992). Mediating and moderating effects in job style. Journal of Management, 18, 657-676. Evaluate, T. A. (2003). Showcase job pleasure through mental challenge. In E. A. Locke (Ed. ), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 75-89). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Judge, Big t. A., Parker, S. T., Colbert, A. E., Likas?, D., & Ilies, R. (2002). A cross-cultural assessment. In N. Anderson & D. S i9000. Ones (Eds. ), Handbook of industrial, job and company psychology, Volume. 2 (pp. 25-52). 1, 000 Oaks, FLORIDA: Sage. Kelley, M. L. (1990). New process technology, job design, and function organization: A contingency unit. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 191-208. Kopelman, R. Electronic. (1985). Task redesign and productivity: An assessment the evidence. Nationwide Productivity Review, 4(3), 237-255. Larson, M. (1998, April). Knowing more: Earlier single profiles in speed. BNP Mass media, 48-52. Levering, R., & Moskowitz, Meters. (2005, January 24). The 100 finest companies to work for. Fortune, 76. Levering, R., & Moskowitz, M. (2007, January 22). The 100 greatest companies to work for. Fortune, 94.
FRED C. LUNENBURG ____________________________________________________________________________________11
Lewis, D. (2001, April 16). Volvo transforms design into collaborative activity. InternetWeek, 54-58. Loher, M. T., Noe, R. A., Moeller, D. L., & Fitzgerald, Meters. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of task characteristics to job fulfillment. Journal of Applied Mindset, 70(2), 280-289. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed. ). Reading, MOTHER: AddisonWesley. Miner, J. N. (1980). Task characteristics theory of work redesign. In T. B. Miner (Ed. ), Theories of organizational behavior (pp. 231-266. ). Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, And. (2006). Building the antecedents of proactive behavior at the office. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. Rentsch, L. R., & Steel, L. P. (1998). Testing the durability of job characteristics because predictors of absenteeism over the six-year period. Personnel Psychology, 51(1), 165-190. Robbins, S i9000. P., & Judge, To. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th impotence. ). Upper Saddle Riv, NJ: Prentice Hall. Saavedra, & Kwun, S. E. (2000). Efficient states in job attributes theory. Log of Organizational Behavior, twenty-one, 131-146. Snell, S. A., & Dean, J. Watts. (1994). Proper compensation intended for integrated manufacturing: The moderating effects of careers and company inertia. Academy of Managing Journal, 37(5), 1109-1140. Spector, P. At the., & Jex, S. M. (1991). Contact of job characteristics from multiple info sources with employee influence, absence, proceeds intentions, and health. Record of Applied Psychology, seventy six, 46-53. Truck der Vegt, Emans, N., & Truck de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating associated with task and outcome interdependence on function teams. Group and Business Management, 23(2), 124-143. Zaccaro, S. J., & Stone, E. N. (1988). Incremental validity of the empirically centered measure of work characteristics. Diary of Utilized Psychology, 73(2), 245-252.